Computational Models of Social Cognition

Dae Houlihan
COGS 50.09

Winter 2025


This course introduces the philosophy and practice of building computational models of social cognition. The course will follow three themes. The topic-theme, social cognition, will explore how people infer beliefs and preferences, plan interactions, and reason about emotions. Other topics in cognitive science will be incorporated to build a conceptual foundation for thinking about how people represent each other. The theoretical-theme, models as epistemological expressions, will emphasize thinking deeply about why and how models are made and used. We will consider how scientists’ views on the mind and the world shape their approaches to building models of the mind, models of people’s mental models of the world, and models of people’s mental models of other minds. We will examine aspects of modeling that are often implicit or deemphasized, including what alternative models were not chosen, the philosophical traditions behind modeling assumptions, how information is learned and represented by models, how data is measured and used, and the various goals and functions of modeling. The methodological-theme, probabilistic programming, will give you a skillset for building formal cognitive models. You will be introduced to probabilistic programming using the PPL memo.

Schedule

Date Topic Reading Assignments
Mon
Jan 6
Introduction to the course
Wed
Jan 8
Modeling as philosophy
• ontology and epistimology
• representation and abstraction
• levels of analysis
Mon
Jan 13
Belief
• intentional stance
• recursive (level-k) beliefs
• false belief
  • Tutorial: 2/3rds Game
Wed
Jan 15
Conditioning generative models
• Bayes’ rule
• cultures and traditions of modeling
• types of uncertainty
Fri
Jan 17
Coding Helproom
Time: 3–5 PM
Location: Moore Hall - CIM Space (Room 213-217)
Mon
Jan 20
Martin Luther King Jr. Day
Class moved to Tuesday Jan 21
Tue
Jan 21
NB Special date, time and location:
Time: 4:30-6:20 PM
Location: Fairchild 008
  • Gerstenberg and Tenenbaum (2017)
  • Goodman et al. (2006)
Tue
Jan 21
PPL Exercise Due

Learning Resources

Probabilistic Models of Cognition

Causal Modeling and Bayesian Data Analysis (BDA)

Probability Theory

memo

Acknowledgments

  • This course is heavily informed by ProbMods (Goodman, Tenenbaum, and Contributors 2016).

    Citation

    N. D. Goodman, J. B. Tenenbaum, and The ProbMods Contributors (2016). Probabilistic Models of Cognition (2nd ed.). Retrieved from https://probmods.org/

    BibTeX
    @misc{probmods2,
      title = {{Probabilistic Models of Cognition}},
      edition = {Second},
      author = {Goodman, Noah D. and Tenenbaum, Joshua B. and The ProbMods Contributors},
      year = {2016},
      howpublished = {\url{http://probmods.org/v2}}
    }
  • Huge thanks to Kartik Chandra and Tony Chen building memo, and to Kartik for adapting memo for this course.

References

Chandra, Kartik, Tony Chen, Joshua Tenenbaum, and Jonathan Ragan-Kelley. 2025. “A Domain-Specific Probabilistic Programming Language for Reasoning About Reasoning (or: A Memo on Memo).” January 9, 2025. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/pt863.
Cusimano, Maddie, Luke B. Hewitt, and Josh H. McDermott. 2024. “Listening with Generative Models.” Cognition 253 (December): 105874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105874.
Gerstenberg, Tobias, and Joshua B Tenenbaum. 2017. “Intuitive Theories.” In Oxford Handbook of Causal Reasoning, edited by Michael Waldmannn, 515–48. Oxford University Press.
Goodman, Noah D, Chris L Baker, Elizabeth Baraff Bonawitz, Vikash K Mansinghka, Alison Gopnik, Henry Wellman, Laura Schulz, and Joshua B Tenenbaum. 2006. “Intuitive Theories of Mind: A Rational Approach to False Belief.” In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Vol. 28.
Goodman, Noah D, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, and The ProbMods Contributors. 2016. “Probabilistic Models of Cognition.” http://probmods.org/v2.
Houlihan, Sean Dae, Max Kleiman-Weiner, Luke B. Hewitt, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, and Rebecca Saxe. 2023. “Emotion Prediction as Computation over a Generative Theory of Mind.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 381 (2251): 20220047. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2022.0047.
Jaynes, E. T. 2003. Probability Theory: The Logic of Science. Edited by G. Larry Bretthorst. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790423.
Marr, David. 1982. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
McElreath, Richard. 2016. Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan. Chapman & Hall/CRC Texts in Statistical Science Series 122. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group.
Moon, Katie, and Deborah Blackman. 2014. “A Guide to Understanding Social Science Research for Natural Scientists.” Conservation Biology 28 (5): 1167–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12326.
Poldrack, Russell A. 2021. “The Physics of Representation.” Synthese 199 (1): 1307–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02793-y.
Tenenbaum, Joshua B, Charles Kemp, Thomas L Griffiths, and Noah D Goodman. 2011. “How to Grow a Mind: Statistics, Structure, and Abstraction.” Science 331 (6022): 1279–85. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1192788.
Varela, Francisco J., Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press.